What Bill 88 Means for Kihei Condos If You Want to Live There (Not Rent It Out)

Almost everything written about Bill 88 is aimed at investors doing math on their rental income. Let me flip it around, because I work the other side of that trade: if you actually want to live in Kihei, with the sun, the Kamaole beaches, and a real year-round town, the reshaping of Kihei's condo market is one of the better things to happen to your buying prospects in years. You just have to read it correctly.

Here's the resident's take, minus the investor hand-wringing. If Kihei is on your list, start with the Kihei area overview and my buyer process, then come back for the read on Bill 88.

Bill 9 and Bill 88, in plain terms

For years, a large share of Kihei's older beachside condos operated as de facto vacation rentals: apartment-zoned units historically allowed to rent short-term under a 2001 legal opinion, the group known locally as the Minatoya List. Amid the island's acute housing shortage, the County moved to push those buildings back toward long-term, resident housing.

Bill 9, signed in December 2025, is the mechanism: it phases transient use out of the apartment-zoned Minatoya List complexes. For South Maui, which includes Kihei, the phase-out deadline is January 1, 2031. That's the piece that matters to a resident buyer: a hard date by which a large tranche of Kihei condos must stop operating as nightly rentals unless something changes.

Bill 88 is the "something changes." On June 19, 2026, the Maui County Council passed it on second and final reading by a 7-2 vote, and it now awaits the Mayor's expected signature. It creates two new hotel-district zoning classes, H-3 and H-4, that mirror the existing apartment zones in nearly every respect but with one difference: they explicitly permit short-term rentals. In other words, Bill 88 opens a door for certain complexes to keep transient use rather than convert.

Why the phase-out helps resident buyers

If you're buying to live there, a move away from nightly rentals is mostly upside. Buildings with fewer transient guests are quieter, more neighborly, and more community-minded, the opposite of a lobby full of rolling suitcases and a new set of strangers every week. And as investors who bought purely for rental yield step back, you face less competition for exactly the kind of units that make good full-time homes.

The same regulatory shift that reads as a threat in an investor's spreadsheet reads as an opening in a resident's search. That's not spin; it's just whose side of the transaction you're on. What Bill 88 adds is a sorting mechanism: it starts to separate the Kihei buildings that will likely stay transient from the ones genuinely trending toward full-time residential life. For a live-there buyer, knowing which is which is the whole game.

The three buckets, read for residents

Between Bill 9 and Bill 88, Kihei condos now fall into three groups. The investor version of this framing asks "can I keep renting it nightly?" The resident version asks the opposite: "is this building actually becoming a place people live?" Here's how I read each group for clients who want a home, not a rental operation.

The resort-zoned group

A handful of South Maui buildings were always hotel- or resort-zoned and never on the Minatoya List, among them Mana Kai, Royal Mauian, and Maui Banyan. None of this legislation touches them; they can keep renting nightly indefinitely. For a resident, that's the point: these are the buildings least likely to ever feel like a neighborhood. Perfectly nice places to own a second home, but not where I'd send someone hunting for a quiet, year-round community.

The TIG Exhibit 2 group

When Bill 9 was being debated, the Council appointed a four-member Temporary Investigative Group (TIG) to identify which Minatoya List properties were best suited to remain short-term rentals. Their recommendation, "Exhibit 2," named several Kihei complexes, among them Kamaole Sands, Maui Kamaole, Maui Hill, Maui Sunset, Maui Vista, Kihei Bay Surf, Kihei Bay Vista, and Hale Kamaole. For an investor, being on this list is reassuring. For a resident, it's a flag in the other direction: these are the buildings the County has signaled it's open to keeping transient, so they're the least likely to convert into the calm, owner-occupied buildings a full-time buyer usually wants. That doesn't rule them out (some units in these complexes are owner-occupied today, and rezoning is far from certain), but you should buy one knowing the vacation-rental character may not go away.

The non-TIG Minatoya group

These are Kihei's Minatoya List buildings that didn't make Exhibit 2. Without the County's implicit endorsement, their path to keeping short-term use is longer and far from guaranteed. The investor read treats that as risk. The resident read treats it as trajectory: unless a building wins its own rezoning or the ongoing legal challenges succeed, its units must transition to long-term, resident housing by January 1, 2031. These are the buildings most likely to become genuine full-time communities, and often the ones where a patient resident buyer finds the clearest opening as investor-owners step back. Nothing here is settled, so each building still has to be checked individually, but this is the group I watch most closely for clients who want to actually move in.

How it could reshape inventory and price

Here's the mechanism. When a unit can no longer command premium nightly income, some investor-owners decide to sell, and the building gradually reprices toward what a resident (not a rental operator) will pay. That puts downward pressure on prices in affected buildings and shifts the ownership mix toward owner-occupants over time. That pressure is strongest in the non-TIG group, where the path back to short-term use is least certain, and it's part of the broader dynamic behind why some condo prices have softened.

For a patient resident buyer, that's a real opportunity. The trick is telling which buildings are genuinely transitioning toward residential life versus which are stuck in limbo waiting on a rezoning decision, and that's exactly the read I bring to a search, building by building, rather than trusting a headline or a listing's spin.

What to confirm per building before you buy

Because this is active policy with applications, deadlines, and litigation all still in motion, you buy the building, not the headline. Before you commit, I confirm, in writing where possible:

the building's current zoning (apartment vs. hotel) and its Minatoya List status; whether it appears on TIG Exhibit 2; whether an H-3/H-4 rezoning application has actually been filed and where it stands; the current permitted use and minimum lease terms (in a large complex like Kamaole Sands these can even vary unit to unit); and how the AOAO is handling the transition financially, since new rules and rezoning efforts can trigger new costs. That means reading the minutes and the budget, not just the listing.

Above all, I verify current legal status with the County for the specific building rather than trusting a seller's or listing's characterization. Between Bill 9's deadline and Bill 88's application process, "what this building is" is genuinely a moving target right now, which is why that verification is a standard part of how I work every Kihei condo deal.

Frequently asked questions